Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler. Edward G. Nilges

Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler


Build.Your.Own.NET.Language.and.Compiler.pdf
ISBN: 1590591348,9781590591345 | 408 pages | 11 Mb


Download Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler



Build Your Own .NET Language and Compiler Edward G. Nilges
Publisher: Apress




The Scala.Net compiler does compile itself, some 100k lines or so of Scala code. Functional languages are killer at creating DSLs. It is a language that most of us once knew, which we may have forgotten about, which has grown and matured while we have been courting the current generation of programming languages. For those of you who don't know what Boo is its a statically typed CLR language with Python like syntax that lets you extend it's compiler, and the language itself easily by giving you access to the AST (Abstract Syntax Tree) and Which is why I' ve been reading Ayende's book DSLs in Boo: Domain Specific Languages in .NET. How did you make this all work? It is kind of like a young boy, it died a slow death when its .NET cousin came on the scene. You can build a great Metro style app with HTML and JavaScript that can interact with the Xbox 360 controller through building your own Windows Runtime component in C++. For the programmer it makes a great deal more sense too, learning one language to build applications for both environments. I even wrote my own BASIC like compiler, using the Abacus Basic compiler (for C64) just so I could create an even faster basic so I could write a video game. If you're more of a power user and build your own computers or plan on run Windows in a virtual machine, you will have to purchase a copy of Windows. The current implementation is already quite robust. Because C# is a static language, the type checking is performed by the compiler—not by you. I keep hearing that C++11 makes things so much easier now and that C++11 has fixed many of the problems of C++98. If a project requires lots of concurrency/parallelism, its own language, or lots of math, you should think functional programming. Net or a standalone DLL in C++ is not the same as building a Windows Runtime component. From a company point of view scarce resources, good developers, can be moved easily between guide here and a slide presentation overview of Scala.Net project here. Unfortunately, most texts on language and compiler development are hard to digest, written from academic platforms for use in college-level computer science programs. One interesting example NET CLR (and other platforms). So if he says that about the language, I am sure you can draw your own conclusions. You wouldn't build your whole system with a DSL, but, like the 5ESS switch, you could use it to code a critical function in a way that is easier to understand and maintain and, therefore, ensure its quality. NET Framework APIs that are required to build your own .NET compiler. An OEM version of Windows will run you anywhere from $99 to $189, depending on which version of Windows . For Windows 8, we completely reimagined the platform, allowing you to choose the programming language and technologies you already know to build apps tailored to the device and form factor.